Faggiolani C., Solimine G. (2012), Research evalua- tion, bibliometry and Bertoldo’s tree, in «AIB Studi», 52(1)
Figà Talamanca A. (1999), How to “objectively” eval- uate the quality of scientific research: The case of the “Impact Factor”, in «Bulletin of the Italian Mathematical Union», Series 8, Vol. 2-A – Mathematics in Society and Culture (1999), 3, pp. 249-281, article presented at the Iv Seminar of the National Information System For Mathematics Sinm 2000: “A model of national information system for disciplinary areas”, Lecce, Monday 2 October 2000.
De Robbio A. (2009), Open Access as a strategy for evaluating intellectual productions, in «CIBER 1999-2009» Ledizioni, Milano, and “New Frontiers of Scientometry: Open Access as a Tool for Research Evaluation”, CNBA Seminar. “The weight of research. Evaluating a humanistic subject: Architecture, for example”, Bologna, 22 May 2009.
Daniel Torres-Salinas Lybrary Catalog Analysis as a tool in studies of social sciences and Humanities: An explorato- ry study of published book titles in Economics 2009,
Turbanti S. (2014), Navigating the sea of Scopus, Web of science and Google Scholar: the launch of a research on the vitality of Italian archival and librarianship disciplines, in «AIB Studi», 54(2/3)
See for Area 14 http://www.sisec.it/wp-content/ uploads/2019/01/SISP_SISEC_Proposta-per-la-valuzione- delle-riviste-22-1-19.pdf proposed by Società Italiana di Political Science (SISP) and Italian Society of Economic Sociology (SISEC): in the conclusion “the integration of the two methods (peer judgment bibliometric indicators such as hindex) seems to us to offer the best system to ar- rive at a classification that holds together both the quali- tative-reputational and quantitative-citational aspects”.